Distributed Data Parallel Training¶
The following section explains the parallelization strategy Tarantella uses to provide distributed training. A full understanding thereof is, however, not required to be able to use the software. Please note the points to consider to achieve best performance and reproducibility.
The general idea¶
In order to parallelize the training of DNNs, different, complementary strategies are available. The conceptually simplest and most efficient one is called data parallelism. This strategy is already in use when deploying batched optimizers, such as stochastic gradient descent (SGD) or ADAM. In this case, input samples are grouped together in so-called mini-batches and are processed in parallel.
Distribution of mini-batches¶
Tarantella extends this scheme by splitting each mini-batch into a number of micro-batches, which are then executed on different devices (e.g., GPUs). In order to do this, the DNN is replicated on each device, which then processes part of the data independently of the other devices. During the backpropagation pass, partial results need to be accumulated via a so-called allreduce collective operation.
Overlapping communication with computation¶
Tarantella implements this communication scheme using the Global Address Space Programming Interface (GASPI). This allows in particular to overlap the communication needed to execute allreduce operations with the computation done in the backpropagation part of the DNN training. This is done by starting allreduce operations as soon as the required local incoming gradients are available, while continuing with backpropagation calculations at the same time. The final, accumulated gradients are only expected once the entire backpropagation is completed. This drastically mitigates the communication overhead introduced by the need to synchronize the different devices, and leads to higher scalability.
The granularity at which Tarantella executes allreduce operations can be varied from one allreduce per layer (finest granularity) to one allreduce per iteration (coarsest granularity). Using coarser granularities, i.e., fusing gradient tensors, can lead to better bandwidth utilization, thus potentially increasing performance. Tensor Fusion is set up before the first iteration of training and incurs no additional communication overhead. Tarantella enables Tensor Fusion by default, but its granularity can be adjusted by the user, cf. here.
Model initialization and loading¶
In order to guarantee that all devices have the same copy of the DNN when training is initiated, the model needs to be communicated from one device to all the others. This is done in Tarantella via the use of a so-called broadcast operation. This scheme applies both when the weights of a DNN are initialized randomly, or loaded from a checkpoint. As Tarantella provides this functionality automatically, the user does not have to take care of it.
In order to process micro-batches independently on each device and to obtain the same results as in serial execution, the input data of each mini-batch has to be split and distributed among all devices.
Tarantella automatically takes care of this through the use of distributed datasets.
The user simply provides Tarantella with a
tf.data.Dataset that is batched
with the mini-batch size. Tarantella will then automatically distribute the input data
by splitting the mini-batch into individual micro-batches. Splitting is done at the level
of samples (as opposed to e.g., files) to ensure reproducibility
of serial results.
To guarantee reproducibility, it is also important that shuffling of samples is done
in the same way on all devices. Tarantella does this using either the
by the user, or a specific default seed. Please refer to the
for more details.
Points to Consider¶
Global versus local batch size¶
As explained above, when using data parallelism, there exists a mini-batch size (in the following also called global batch size or simply batch size) as well as a micro-batch size (also called local batch size). The former represents the number of samples that is averaged over in the loss function of the optimizer, and is equivalent to the (mini-)batch size used in non-distributed training. The latter is the number of samples that is processed locally by each of the devices per iteration.
In Tarantella, the user always specifies the global batch size.
Using a strictly synchronous optimization scheme, and by carefully handling the data distribution, Tarantella guarantees the reproducibility of DNN training results independently of the number of devices used, as long as all hyperparameters (such as global batch size and learning rate) are kept constant. 1
However, to achieve best performance for certain DNN operators (Conv2D, Dense, etc.) it is often advisable to keep the local batch size constant, and scale the global batch size with the number of devices used. This, in turn, will force you to adjust other hyperparameters, such as the learning rate, in order to converge to a comparable test accuracy, as observed for instance in [Shallue].
For best performance, scale the batch size with the number of devices used, and adapt the learning rate schedule.
Batch normalization layers¶
The issue of global versus local batch size particularly affects the layers that calculate (and learn) statistics over entire batches. A well-known example of this type of layer is batch normalization.
Tarantella always calculates batch statistics over local batches.
As a consequence, the training results for DNNs with batch-normalization layers will not be identical when changing the number of devices, even if the global batch size stays the same. At the moment, this can be circumvented by using normalization layers that do not average over entire batches, such as instance normalization [Ulyanov].
Averaging over local batches instead of global batches should in practice have only minor influence on the quality of the final test accuracy. Note however, the extreme case of very small local batch sizes.
BatchNormalization layers when the global batch size
divided by the number of devices used is smaller than 16.
In such cases, the local batches that are used to collect statistics are too small to obtain meaningful results. This will likely reduce the benefits of batch normalization, cf. for instance [Yang] and [Uppal]. In this case, please consider increasing the global batch size, or reducing the number of devices used.
Managing individual devices¶
Although Tarantella’s user interface abstracts away most of the details of
parallel programming, it is sometimes useful to be able to control
Python code execution at device level. This can be achieved using the
rank. Details on how to do this can be found in the
Shallue, Christopher J., et al. “Measuring the effects of data parallelism on neural network training.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.03600 (2018).
Ulyanov, Dmitry, Andrea Vedaldi, and Victor Lempitsky. “Instance normalization: The missing ingredient for fast stylization.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.08022 (2016).
Goyal, Priya, et al. “Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hour.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.02677 (2017).
Yang, Greg, et al. “A mean field theory of batch normalization.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.08129 (2019).
Curse of Batch Normalization (2020).
McCandlish, Sam, et al. “An empirical model of large-batch training.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.06162 (2018).
He, Kaiming, et al. “Deep residual learning for image recognition.” Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.03385 (2016).
Vaswani, Ashish, et al. “Attention is all you need.” Advances in neural information processing systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.03762 (2017).